Welcome to the Sexy and Funny Forums forums.

You are currently viewing our forums as a guest which gives you very limited access to what we have to offer. By joining our community you will have access to post replies/topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, remove some of the ads and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.

Bored? Go watch girls get naked on cam for free!

Go Back   Sexy and Funny Forums > Special Interest > The Master Debaters
User Name
Password

Latest from S&F
Random S&F
  
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes 0 Attachment(s)
Old 03-23-2017, 06:06 AM   #21
billxl883
Why don't I have a Custom Title by now?
 
billxl883's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 3,331
Casino Cash: $5755
My Mood:
Rep Power: 10
Avg Rep Per Post: 3.68
billxl883 has a reputation beyond repute (12269 total rep)
billxl883 has a reputation beyond repute (12269 total rep)billxl883 has a reputation beyond repute (12269 total rep)billxl883 has a reputation beyond repute (12269 total rep)billxl883 has a reputation beyond repute (12269 total rep)billxl883 has a reputation beyond repute (12269 total rep)billxl883 has a reputation beyond repute (12269 total rep)billxl883 has a reputation beyond repute (12269 total rep)billxl883 has a reputation beyond repute (12269 total rep)billxl883 has a reputation beyond repute (12269 total rep)billxl883 has a reputation beyond repute (12269 total rep)billxl883 has a reputation beyond repute (12269 total rep)billxl883 has a reputation beyond repute (12269 total rep)billxl883 has a reputation beyond repute (12269 total rep)billxl883 has a reputation beyond repute (12269 total rep)billxl883 has a reputation beyond repute (12269 total rep)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by infantrystud
... The truth is that LTG Michael Flynn was, as they say, "unmasked" when his conversations with the Russians was "wiretapped" i.e. collected. That is against the law and someone high up in either the Obama administration or in the NSA leaked that. That's against the law. Flynn has protections as a USPER that were casually thrown out the door in the name of politics. All of this is true. ...
Why are you so sure that it was an Obama type that leaked? There was so much turmoil and fighting for position with the transition team that it could easily have been a Trumpster.
__________________
Trained by experts in the art of hiding dead bodies.
billxl883 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 03-23-2017, 12:20 PM   #22
infantrystud
Why don't I have a Custom Title by now?
 
infantrystud's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 8,290
Casino Cash: $3900
My Mood:
Rep Power: 10
Avg Rep Per Post: 2.44
infantrystud has a reputation beyond repute (20206 total rep)x3
infantrystud has a reputation beyond repute (20206 total rep)infantrystud has a reputation beyond repute (20206 total rep)infantrystud has a reputation beyond repute (20206 total rep)infantrystud has a reputation beyond repute (20206 total rep)infantrystud has a reputation beyond repute (20206 total rep)infantrystud has a reputation beyond repute (20206 total rep)infantrystud has a reputation beyond repute (20206 total rep)
Default

Not really. The conversation happened before the election. Which means, the political types in the WH and other high levels that would have gotten this intelligence were from the Obama admin. In fact, was it not the acting AG Sally Yates that came out and said that Flynn might be subject to blackmail because what he said publicly is not what he said privately to the Russians? How would she had known that?

The leaker is most likely Sally Yates. An Obama holdover.



Quote:
Originally Posted by billxl883
Quote:
Originally Posted by infantrystud
... The truth is that LTG Michael Flynn was, as they say, "unmasked" when his conversations with the Russians was "wiretapped" i.e. collected. That is against the law and someone high up in either the Obama administration or in the NSA leaked that. That's against the law. Flynn has protections as a USPER that were casually thrown out the door in the name of politics. All of this is true. ...
Why are you so sure that it was an Obama type that leaked? There was so much turmoil and fighting for position with the transition team that it could easily have been a Trumpster.
__________________
------------


Quote:
darthbob88

1. It's not racist if it's true.


infantrystud is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 03-24-2017, 06:49 AM   #23
billxl883
Why don't I have a Custom Title by now?
 
billxl883's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 3,331
Casino Cash: $5755
My Mood:
Rep Power: 10
Avg Rep Per Post: 3.68
billxl883 has a reputation beyond repute (12269 total rep)
billxl883 has a reputation beyond repute (12269 total rep)billxl883 has a reputation beyond repute (12269 total rep)billxl883 has a reputation beyond repute (12269 total rep)billxl883 has a reputation beyond repute (12269 total rep)billxl883 has a reputation beyond repute (12269 total rep)billxl883 has a reputation beyond repute (12269 total rep)billxl883 has a reputation beyond repute (12269 total rep)billxl883 has a reputation beyond repute (12269 total rep)billxl883 has a reputation beyond repute (12269 total rep)billxl883 has a reputation beyond repute (12269 total rep)billxl883 has a reputation beyond repute (12269 total rep)billxl883 has a reputation beyond repute (12269 total rep)billxl883 has a reputation beyond repute (12269 total rep)billxl883 has a reputation beyond repute (12269 total rep)billxl883 has a reputation beyond repute (12269 total rep)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by infantrystud
Not really. The conversation happened before the election. Which means, the political types in the WH and other high levels that would have gotten this intelligence were from the Obama admin. In fact, was it not the acting AG Sally Yates that came out and said that Flynn might be subject to blackmail because what he said publicly is not what he said privately to the Russians? How would she had known that?

The leaker is most likely Sally Yates. An Obama holdover.



Quote:
Originally Posted by billxl883
Why are you so sure that it was an Obama type that leaked? There was so much turmoil and fighting for position with the transition team that it could easily have been a Trumpster.
The conversation happened before the election, but the leak happened after the transition team started being briefed in. Your own link says that Yates warned the incoming administration, so they knew too.
Quote:
Originally Posted by your link
... James R. Clapper Jr. and John Brennan, President Obama’s directors of national intelligence and the CIA, reportedly shared Yates’s concerns and agreed with her decision to warn the Trump administration ...
__________________
Trained by experts in the art of hiding dead bodies.
billxl883 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 03-25-2017, 03:24 PM   #24
infantrystud
Why don't I have a Custom Title by now?
 
infantrystud's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 8,290
Casino Cash: $3900
My Mood:
Rep Power: 10
Avg Rep Per Post: 2.44
infantrystud has a reputation beyond repute (20206 total rep)x3
infantrystud has a reputation beyond repute (20206 total rep)infantrystud has a reputation beyond repute (20206 total rep)infantrystud has a reputation beyond repute (20206 total rep)infantrystud has a reputation beyond repute (20206 total rep)infantrystud has a reputation beyond repute (20206 total rep)infantrystud has a reputation beyond repute (20206 total rep)infantrystud has a reputation beyond repute (20206 total rep)
Default

The point you don't seem to get is that you cannot collect on Flynn. Unless you have a FISA order to do so which requires an investigation.

Incidental collection of a USPER means they remain "masked" and identified only as USPER1, USPER2, etc.

The "unmasked" Flynn. And, it is likely the Obama administration abused raw intelligence for political gain.

But, the good news is that only a small amount of people got the raw intelligence.

Quote:
Originally Posted by billxl883
Quote:
Originally Posted by infantrystud
Not really. The conversation happened before the election. Which means, the political types in the WH and other high levels that would have gotten this intelligence were from the Obama admin. In fact, was it not the acting AG Sally Yates that came out and said that Flynn might be subject to blackmail because what he said publicly is not what he said privately to the Russians? How would she had known that?

The leaker is most likely Sally Yates. An Obama holdover.



The conversation happened before the election, but the leak happened after the transition team started being briefed in. Your own link says that Yates warned the incoming administration, so they knew too.
Quote:
Originally Posted by your link
... James R. Clapper Jr. and John Brennan, President Obama’s directors of national intelligence and the CIA, reportedly shared Yates’s concerns and agreed with her decision to warn the Trump administration ...
__________________
------------


Quote:
darthbob88

1. It's not racist if it's true.


infantrystud is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 03-26-2017, 07:23 AM   #25
billxl883
Why don't I have a Custom Title by now?
 
billxl883's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 3,331
Casino Cash: $5755
My Mood:
Rep Power: 10
Avg Rep Per Post: 3.68
billxl883 has a reputation beyond repute (12269 total rep)
billxl883 has a reputation beyond repute (12269 total rep)billxl883 has a reputation beyond repute (12269 total rep)billxl883 has a reputation beyond repute (12269 total rep)billxl883 has a reputation beyond repute (12269 total rep)billxl883 has a reputation beyond repute (12269 total rep)billxl883 has a reputation beyond repute (12269 total rep)billxl883 has a reputation beyond repute (12269 total rep)billxl883 has a reputation beyond repute (12269 total rep)billxl883 has a reputation beyond repute (12269 total rep)billxl883 has a reputation beyond repute (12269 total rep)billxl883 has a reputation beyond repute (12269 total rep)billxl883 has a reputation beyond repute (12269 total rep)billxl883 has a reputation beyond repute (12269 total rep)billxl883 has a reputation beyond repute (12269 total rep)billxl883 has a reputation beyond repute (12269 total rep)
Default

I understand how masking works. One of the reasons for unmasking a USPER is if the identity is necessary to understand the intelligence.

I suppose it depends on your definition of "collect" when you say you cannot collect on Flynn. If the target was Kislyak or the Turks and Flynn was on the other end of the conversation then Flynn becomes "incidental collection" and the collection is legal. If the target was Flynn himself then without a criminal investigation or FISA warrant it would have been illegal. Nunes has said the the Flynn intel was the result of "incidental collection".

Speaking of Nunes, I wouldn't put too much stock in whatever he says. Here's a guy whose story has changed several times this week. A guy who ran to the president because his people, maybe even the president himself, were mentioned in the intel. Who refuses to tell even members of his own committee where the report came from. Who still has not shown this intel to any other committee members. Who unilaterally cancelled a hearing scheduled for this coming week where Clapper, Brennan and Yates were scheduled to testify and that undoubtedly would have shed light on the source of Nunes' report. And here's the clincher - Nunes was on the transition team. Nunes has lost any credibility he may have had, even some republicans are now calling for him to either step aside or for a select committee to be set up.

The WSJ editorial you linked is behind a paywall, but here's something that sheds light on the legality of collecting on Flynn.
__________________
Trained by experts in the art of hiding dead bodies.
billxl883 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 03-26-2017, 07:04 PM   #26
infantrystud
Why don't I have a Custom Title by now?
 
infantrystud's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 8,290
Casino Cash: $3900
My Mood:
Rep Power: 10
Avg Rep Per Post: 2.44
infantrystud has a reputation beyond repute (20206 total rep)x3
infantrystud has a reputation beyond repute (20206 total rep)infantrystud has a reputation beyond repute (20206 total rep)infantrystud has a reputation beyond repute (20206 total rep)infantrystud has a reputation beyond repute (20206 total rep)infantrystud has a reputation beyond repute (20206 total rep)infantrystud has a reputation beyond repute (20206 total rep)infantrystud has a reputation beyond repute (20206 total rep)
+10
Default

From the article you cited:

Quote:
A caveat, of course, is that dissemination is only permitted to recipients who need that information in the performance of their official duties. The public disclosure of such information is a wholly separate issue, beyond the scope of this article.

LOL, why is it a wholly separate issue? It is illegal, period.

Flynn's communications can be unmasked under the condition the article states but it cannot be released anonymously to the media. And, we don't even know if the unmasking meets the criteria the article talks about.



Quote:
Originally Posted by billxl883
I understand how masking works. One of the reasons for unmasking a USPER is if the identity is necessary to understand the intelligence.

I suppose it depends on your definition of "collect" when you say you cannot collect on Flynn. If the target was Kislyak or the Turks and Flynn was on the other end of the conversation then Flynn becomes "incidental collection" and the collection is legal. If the target was Flynn himself then without a criminal investigation or FISA warrant it would have been illegal. Nunes has said the the Flynn intel was the result of "incidental collection".

Speaking of Nunes, I wouldn't put too much stock in whatever he says. Here's a guy whose story has changed several times this week. A guy who ran to the president because his people, maybe even the president himself, were mentioned in the intel. Who refuses to tell even members of his own committee where the report came from. Who still has not shown this intel to any other committee members. Who unilaterally cancelled a hearing scheduled for this coming week where Clapper, Brennan and Yates were scheduled to testify and that undoubtedly would have shed light on the source of Nunes' report. And here's the clincher - Nunes was on the transition team. Nunes has lost any credibility he may have had, even some republicans are now calling for him to either step aside or for a select committee to be set up.

The WSJ editorial you linked is behind a paywall, but here's something that sheds light on the legality of collecting on Flynn.
__________________
------------


Quote:
darthbob88

1. It's not racist if it's true.


infantrystud is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 03-27-2017, 08:03 AM   #27
billxl883
Why don't I have a Custom Title by now?
 
billxl883's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 3,331
Casino Cash: $5755
My Mood:
Rep Power: 10
Avg Rep Per Post: 3.68
billxl883 has a reputation beyond repute (12269 total rep)
billxl883 has a reputation beyond repute (12269 total rep)billxl883 has a reputation beyond repute (12269 total rep)billxl883 has a reputation beyond repute (12269 total rep)billxl883 has a reputation beyond repute (12269 total rep)billxl883 has a reputation beyond repute (12269 total rep)billxl883 has a reputation beyond repute (12269 total rep)billxl883 has a reputation beyond repute (12269 total rep)billxl883 has a reputation beyond repute (12269 total rep)billxl883 has a reputation beyond repute (12269 total rep)billxl883 has a reputation beyond repute (12269 total rep)billxl883 has a reputation beyond repute (12269 total rep)billxl883 has a reputation beyond repute (12269 total rep)billxl883 has a reputation beyond repute (12269 total rep)billxl883 has a reputation beyond repute (12269 total rep)billxl883 has a reputation beyond repute (12269 total rep)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by infantrystud
Flynn's communications can be unmasked under the condition the article states but it cannot be released anonymously to the media. And, we don't even know if the unmasking meets the criteria the article talks about.
Exactly, and your assertion that it is most likely Yates has no more validity than saying Trump himself leaked it (which really is a possibility). There was a leak of supposed intel to Nunes last week, just after a week of bad press for Trump. Could somebody in the White House have leaked it to deflect attention and try to get the news cycle on another topic? Could they have even made it up from whole cloth? Definitely possible.
__________________
Trained by experts in the art of hiding dead bodies.
billxl883 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 03-27-2017, 01:00 PM   #28
infantrystud
Why don't I have a Custom Title by now?
 
infantrystud's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 8,290
Casino Cash: $3900
My Mood:
Rep Power: 10
Avg Rep Per Post: 2.44
infantrystud has a reputation beyond repute (20206 total rep)x3
infantrystud has a reputation beyond repute (20206 total rep)infantrystud has a reputation beyond repute (20206 total rep)infantrystud has a reputation beyond repute (20206 total rep)infantrystud has a reputation beyond repute (20206 total rep)infantrystud has a reputation beyond repute (20206 total rep)infantrystud has a reputation beyond repute (20206 total rep)infantrystud has a reputation beyond repute (20206 total rep)
Default

I doubt it. Trump has a bad week every week with the news cycle. As bad as Trump is with his tweets, the press is just as bad - or even worse - with their instant analysis and conclusions. It truly is a fascinating shit show to watch. After 8 years, now all of a sudden we have an inquisitive press. LOL

Back to Flynn... Why would Trump leak it himself? He could - and did - just tell Flynn to resign. And, again, this conversation(s) that Flynn had with the Russians were during the Obama administration. Which means, the "Obama" people were in key positions to be able to get the raw intelligence i.e. the Flynn transcripts.

I'm hearing more now the Ben Rhodes might be someone who leaked it. Either way, if you read, of all things - the NY Times - you have seen the evolution of the story.

This investigation - if it is ever done above board and comprehensively is likely to uncover some shady shit on all sides.

I'm curious to see what Nunes reveals this week, if anything. Just as you dont likely trust him, Schiff has a deer in the headlights look to him and he is a partisan fuck, too.


Quote:
Originally Posted by billxl883
Quote:
Originally Posted by infantrystud
Flynn's communications can be unmasked under the condition the article states but it cannot be released anonymously to the media. And, we don't even know if the unmasking meets the criteria the article talks about.
Exactly, and your assertion that it is most likely Yates has no more validity than saying Trump himself leaked it (which really is a possibility). There was a leak of supposed intel to Nunes last week, just after a week of bad press for Trump. Could somebody in the White House have leaked it to deflect attention and try to get the news cycle on another topic? Could they have even made it up from whole cloth? Definitely possible.
__________________
------------


Quote:
darthbob88

1. It's not racist if it's true.


infantrystud is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 12-16-2017, 06:08 AM   #29
rwh1960huck
Huck is now the forums Liberal voice. trolls & Republicans beware
 
rwh1960huck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 7,123
Casino Cash: $37059
Rep Power: 10
Avg Rep Per Post: 14.41
rwh1960huck has a reputation beyond repute (102618 total rep)x15
rwh1960huck has a reputation beyond repute (102618 total rep)rwh1960huck has a reputation beyond repute (102618 total rep)rwh1960huck has a reputation beyond repute (102618 total rep)rwh1960huck has a reputation beyond repute (102618 total rep)rwh1960huck has a reputation beyond repute (102618 total rep)rwh1960huck has a reputation beyond repute (102618 total rep)rwh1960huck has a reputation beyond repute (102618 total rep)rwh1960huck has a reputation beyond repute (102618 total rep)rwh1960huck has a reputation beyond repute (102618 total rep)rwh1960huck has a reputation beyond repute (102618 total rep)rwh1960huck has a reputation beyond repute (102618 total rep)rwh1960huck has a reputation beyond repute (102618 total rep)rwh1960huck has a reputation beyond repute (102618 total rep)rwh1960huck has a reputation beyond repute (102618 total rep)
Default you just wait

hes winning so much, hes going to just fire his way out of charges/indictment
__________________
make America great again
click to show
rwh1960huck is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 12-16-2017, 02:27 PM   #30
infantrystud
Why don't I have a Custom Title by now?
 
infantrystud's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 8,290
Casino Cash: $3900
My Mood:
Rep Power: 10
Avg Rep Per Post: 2.44
infantrystud has a reputation beyond repute (20206 total rep)x3
infantrystud has a reputation beyond repute (20206 total rep)infantrystud has a reputation beyond repute (20206 total rep)infantrystud has a reputation beyond repute (20206 total rep)infantrystud has a reputation beyond repute (20206 total rep)infantrystud has a reputation beyond repute (20206 total rep)infantrystud has a reputation beyond repute (20206 total rep)infantrystud has a reputation beyond repute (20206 total rep)
Default

You must have been really bored to resurrect a thread from 9 months ago.

So, to recap, we were told Trump colluded with the Russians. They haven't been able to prove that, so now they've moved on to what? Obstruction of justice? Except now, we've found out that the FBI has allowed a political hack of an agent to taint both the Hillary and Trump investigation. And, the real collusion might very well be from inside the FBI - against Trump.

Winning?

Quote:
Originally Posted by rwh1960huck
hes winning so much, hes going to just fire his way out of charges/indictment
__________________
------------


Quote:
darthbob88

1. It's not racist if it's true.


infantrystud is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 12-17-2017, 06:01 PM   #31
ShuGuy
Why don't I have a Custom Title by now?
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 2,569
Casino Cash: $5773
Rep Power: 10
Avg Rep Per Post: 4.55
ShuGuy has a reputation beyond repute (11687 total rep)
ShuGuy has a reputation beyond repute (11687 total rep)ShuGuy has a reputation beyond repute (11687 total rep)ShuGuy has a reputation beyond repute (11687 total rep)ShuGuy has a reputation beyond repute (11687 total rep)ShuGuy has a reputation beyond repute (11687 total rep)ShuGuy has a reputation beyond repute (11687 total rep)ShuGuy has a reputation beyond repute (11687 total rep)ShuGuy has a reputation beyond repute (11687 total rep)ShuGuy has a reputation beyond repute (11687 total rep)ShuGuy has a reputation beyond repute (11687 total rep)ShuGuy has a reputation beyond repute (11687 total rep)ShuGuy has a reputation beyond repute (11687 total rep)ShuGuy has a reputation beyond repute (11687 total rep)ShuGuy has a reputation beyond repute (11687 total rep)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by infantrystud
You must have been really bored to resurrect a thread from 9 months ago.

So, to recap, we were told Trump colluded with the Russians. They haven't been able to prove that, so now they've moved on to what? Obstruction of justice? Except now, we've found out that the FBI has allowed a political hack of an agent to taint both the Hillary and Trump investigation. And, the real collusion might very well be from inside the FBI - against Trump.

Winning?

Quote:
Originally Posted by rwh1960huck
hes winning so much, hes going to just fire his way out of charges/indictment

"Political hack" of course being defined as "sent some personal text messages that expressed an opinion you don't like."

The grasping for straws to do anything to discredit this investigation is astounding.
ShuGuy is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 12-18-2017, 03:06 AM   #32
infantrystud
Why don't I have a Custom Title by now?
 
infantrystud's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 8,290
Casino Cash: $3900
My Mood:
Rep Power: 10
Avg Rep Per Post: 2.44
infantrystud has a reputation beyond repute (20206 total rep)x3
infantrystud has a reputation beyond repute (20206 total rep)infantrystud has a reputation beyond repute (20206 total rep)infantrystud has a reputation beyond repute (20206 total rep)infantrystud has a reputation beyond repute (20206 total rep)infantrystud has a reputation beyond repute (20206 total rep)infantrystud has a reputation beyond repute (20206 total rep)infantrystud has a reputation beyond repute (20206 total rep)
Default

There's something wrong with you.

Quote:
Originally Posted by ShuGuy
Quote:
Originally Posted by infantrystud
You must have been really bored to resurrect a thread from 9 months ago.

So, to recap, we were told Trump colluded with the Russians. They haven't been able to prove that, so now they've moved on to what? Obstruction of justice? Except now, we've found out that the FBI has allowed a political hack of an agent to taint both the Hillary and Trump investigation. And, the real collusion might very well be from inside the FBI - against Trump.

Winning?


"Political hack" of course being defined as "sent some personal text messages that expressed an opinion you don't like."

The grasping for straws to do anything to discredit this investigation is astounding.
__________________
------------


Quote:
darthbob88

1. It's not racist if it's true.


infantrystud is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 12-18-2017, 03:11 AM   #33
rwh1960huck
Huck is now the forums Liberal voice. trolls & Republicans beware
 
rwh1960huck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 7,123
Casino Cash: $37059
Rep Power: 10
Avg Rep Per Post: 14.41
rwh1960huck has a reputation beyond repute (102618 total rep)x15
rwh1960huck has a reputation beyond repute (102618 total rep)rwh1960huck has a reputation beyond repute (102618 total rep)rwh1960huck has a reputation beyond repute (102618 total rep)rwh1960huck has a reputation beyond repute (102618 total rep)rwh1960huck has a reputation beyond repute (102618 total rep)rwh1960huck has a reputation beyond repute (102618 total rep)rwh1960huck has a reputation beyond repute (102618 total rep)rwh1960huck has a reputation beyond repute (102618 total rep)rwh1960huck has a reputation beyond repute (102618 total rep)rwh1960huck has a reputation beyond repute (102618 total rep)rwh1960huck has a reputation beyond repute (102618 total rep)rwh1960huck has a reputation beyond repute (102618 total rep)rwh1960huck has a reputation beyond repute (102618 total rep)rwh1960huck has a reputation beyond repute (102618 total rep)
Default borowed under license

Quote:
Originally Posted by infantrystud
There's something wrong with you.

__________________
make America great again
click to show

Last edited by rwh1960huck : 12-18-2017 at 03:13 AM.
rwh1960huck is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 12-18-2017, 08:39 AM   #34
12941
Resident Meanie
 
12941's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 12,466
Casino Cash: $160
Rep Power: 10
Avg Rep Per Post: 10.85
12941 has a reputation beyond repute (135220 total rep)x20
12941 has a reputation beyond repute (135220 total rep)12941 has a reputation beyond repute (135220 total rep)12941 has a reputation beyond repute (135220 total rep)12941 has a reputation beyond repute (135220 total rep)12941 has a reputation beyond repute (135220 total rep)12941 has a reputation beyond repute (135220 total rep)12941 has a reputation beyond repute (135220 total rep)12941 has a reputation beyond repute (135220 total rep)12941 has a reputation beyond repute (135220 total rep)12941 has a reputation beyond repute (135220 total rep)12941 has a reputation beyond repute (135220 total rep)12941 has a reputation beyond repute (135220 total rep)12941 has a reputation beyond repute (135220 total rep)12941 has a reputation beyond repute (135220 total rep)
+10
Default

I think Trump should be made to finish his term.

I'm actually curious how much damage he can do both domestically and internationally.

I'm also curious how the Republicans, including the idiots here, will spin it to show that it was all Hillary's fault.
12941 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 12-18-2017, 01:58 PM   #35
ShuGuy
Why don't I have a Custom Title by now?
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 2,569
Casino Cash: $5773
Rep Power: 10
Avg Rep Per Post: 4.55
ShuGuy has a reputation beyond repute (11687 total rep)
ShuGuy has a reputation beyond repute (11687 total rep)ShuGuy has a reputation beyond repute (11687 total rep)ShuGuy has a reputation beyond repute (11687 total rep)ShuGuy has a reputation beyond repute (11687 total rep)ShuGuy has a reputation beyond repute (11687 total rep)ShuGuy has a reputation beyond repute (11687 total rep)ShuGuy has a reputation beyond repute (11687 total rep)ShuGuy has a reputation beyond repute (11687 total rep)ShuGuy has a reputation beyond repute (11687 total rep)ShuGuy has a reputation beyond repute (11687 total rep)ShuGuy has a reputation beyond repute (11687 total rep)ShuGuy has a reputation beyond repute (11687 total rep)ShuGuy has a reputation beyond repute (11687 total rep)ShuGuy has a reputation beyond repute (11687 total rep)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by infantrystud

Quote:
Originally Posted by ShuGuy

"Political hack" of course being defined as "sent some personal text messages that expressed an opinion you don't like."

The grasping for straws to do anything to discredit this investigation is astounding.

ShuGuy is offline  
Reply With Quote
Reply
Tags: , , , , , ,



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Users Who Have Viewed This Thread In The Last 7 Days: 0
There are no names to display.

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump



All times are GMT. The time now is 05:17 PM.

Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2018, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.